Subject	Dont think they're that fast
Posted by	sunrise089 on August 29, 2002 at 1:39 PM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	I wouldn't say it's as heavy as a tank. posted by Marshall on August 29, 2002 at 12:08 PM
Message	: It's lighter than Z's, Supras, 3000GT's, etc. : They also run high 12's, low 13's stock. Low 13s!?!? I Read Motor Trend review of 2002 Mustang Cobra vs 2002 SS Camaro (both non-convertables) where the Camaro got 0-60 in 5.2 (with a professional driver, and the six speed).....seeing how im under the impression that a z32 will run the quarter in 13.7 stock, and goes 0-60 at the same 5.2 as the Camaro, why would the very torquey, bottom-end strong Camaro run the quarter in .7 seconds+ better than a Z? I think high 13s is closer, unless or course Motor Trend's drivers suck.
Follow Ups	I was just challenged by a former Boss who>> - NSANY(ATL) 10:03:25 08/29/02 I think its 383 to the crank. Also 383ci. Could be wrong. (n/m) - MattMc2281 10:11:06 08/29/02 Is that for a stock SS, or for the DEI car? - NSANY(ATL) 10:15:00 08/29/02 Stock SS is 330 HP Earn upgrades put it too 383 HP I think. (n/m) - MattMc2281 10:34:02 08/29/02 According to this site... - socos 10:45:06 08/29/02 The auto-dimming rearview mirror w/ compass adds 10rwhp (n/m) - J.R. (phx) 11:25:52 08/29/02 Stock LS1 number are bogus anyway - Marshall 11:21:04 08/29/02 If you race him.... - Mal1ce 10:13:09 08/29/02 Rubbin's racin', Son! (n/m) - boileralum00 10:14:06 08/29/02 As you spit a plug of tobbaco. (n/m) - zman92(ATL) 10:15:37 08/29/02 Hell naw! Reel min swalla da backy joos! (n/m) - boileralum00 11:53:01 08/29/02 Hell naw! Reel min swalla da backy joos! (n/m) - boileralum00 12:29:13 08/29/02 i was going to say that, but i feared it would be - Halo Z 10:31:45 08/29/02 LOL, very cold! (n/m) - RezidentEvil 10:54:59 08/29/02 Tell 'em 1 large and it's on. ;) (n/m) - kingtut(So.Cal) 10:31:54 08/29/02 i take it the car is running well? (n/m) - Halo Z 10:34:38 08/29/02 I can't get over 15psi b/c I have the wrong wastegate - NSANY(ATL) 11:52:18 08/29/02 on the road or on the dyno. - Halo Z 12:13:26 08/29/02 both (n/m) - NSANY(ATL) 12:21:37 08/29/02 ew that sux (n/m) - Halo Z 13:37:54 08/29/02 have u looked at what u have, u would win! (n/m) - 90TTKid 15:48:18 08/29/02 OH SHIT!! Just read your profile, The Z will prevail!! DO IT (n/m) - MattMc2281 10:35:42 08/29/02 Re: I was just challenged by a former Boss who>> - Cap927 10:45:39 08/29/02 uhh... i thought the Z-28 is lighter than a 300zx. (n/m) - TTony 10:59:24 08/29/02 Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... - Black Mammoth (VA) 11:05:30 08/29/02 Re: Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... - Cap927 11:24:08 08/29/02 Re: Re: Nope...It's actually 100 to 200lbs heavier... - Cap927 11:27:05 08/29/02 How is 3433 lbs 100 to 200 lbs heavier than 3475 lbs? - Marshall 11:49:14 08/29/02 Re: How is 3433 lbs 100 to 200 lbs heavier than 3475 lbs? - Cap927 12:05:33 08/29/02 I wouldn't say it's as heavy as a tank. - Marshall 12:08:11 08/29/02 Dont think they're that fast - sunrise089 13:39:32 08/29/02 2002 Z-28's run low 13's stock. (n/m) - TTony 14:09:01 08/29/02 You are wrong then. They ARE that fast. - Marshall 14:30:53 08/29/02 Ahem... - sunrise089 20:37:27 08/29/02 You are out of touch with reality. Educate yourself. - Marshall 21:16:56 08/29/02 not trying to argue for arguement's sake....but (long) - sunrise089 00:22:00 08/30/02 I mistake, sorry - sunrise089 00:24:43 08/30/02 about the geocities site: - Marshall 11:24:30 08/30/02 Re: not trying to argue for arguement's sake....but (long) - Marshall 11:53:49 08/30/02 Oh yeah- - Marshall 21:18:10 08/29/02 Check out this site: - Marshall 14:44:32 08/29/02 "former boss", so why not!? :-) (n/m) - FLY 1 (Dallaz) 10:52:24 08/29/02 Where can we buy those undisclosed turbos? :-\ - ZHOUND 11:11:56 08/29/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.